This term is a truncated false rendition of the short form of the name Yâ-hwéh, which is Yâ´hu or its prefix form Yâhuw-. This “Yah” false name is an altered false version approved by Judaism which censors His true names (Midrash on Psalms (Mid. Teh. Pss. 68:3, 113:3)), because it is a false name, and the full explanation is found in our name study, His names proven.

This term is incompatible with every written form of the name of Yâhuwshúa` because it takes absolutely no account for the sixth Hebrew letter waw in it (W) which is found in the form of a shuwrëq (UW) in every single written instance of this name in Hebrew scriptures, which appear as “Joshua” in the KJV. The history of it reportedly is that during the 1960s, certain groups wanted to revive using our Savior’s true name, but evidently, seeing the YHW at the end of names being falsely rendered as “-jah” in the KJV, or the “Jah” of hal’luw Yâ´hu in as it appears in the KJV, they were misled to use this form as a prefix. The adversary did anticipate the reemergence of the true name Testimony in these end-times, and preempted it with a slew of false versions we call “near-miss names” because they resemble the Truth but nonetheless miss the mark.

When probably good-intentioned people with inadequate information sources shallowly investigated His names, seeking to clear what is wrong with the establishment terms, they came up with mistakes such as this term. The flawed method these used to determine their version, is merely taking the term Yâhuwthâ´h, which they see rendered as Yahuwdah, because it is spelled YHWDH, and they noted without the D it would be the same as the tetragrammaton so they subtracted the D to make this term. They also did not see the ending -eh as having a basis in Hebrew, not having studied it, and falsely accused it of “being feminine”. It is documented and explained in our name study, His names proven.

When probably good-intentioned people with inadequate information sources shallowly investigated His names, seeking to clear what is wrong with the establishment terms, they came up with mistakes such as this term. The flawed method these used to determine their version, is assume that “Yahweh” is mistaken, not knowing the reason the “hw” syllable is shortened to a silence, and expanding it as in the short form of Yâ-hwéh in the Yâ´huw- prefix. It is not linguistically accurate. It is documented and explained in our name study, His names proven.

Yâ-hwéh is called the written name, the first of the dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The adversary, through his satanist scribes who did the coding according to satan, only wrote the single name YHWH (YeHoWaH/YeHoWiH) in their Masoretic Text (which is Hebrew scripture coded into shorthand code) whenever the original had said both dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. And into their Septuagint (LXX) translation to Greek they wrote Kurios instead of YHWH wherever the original said Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. But that apparently was not enough. For all those single-name mentions of YHWH in the Hebrew Masoretic text, the English King Supplanter Version (KJV) itself also substituted the supplanter (bá`al/lord) for the King wherever His dual-names had been present in the original, over 8,000 times. But we know that this merely means there were over 8,000 times the dual-names Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` was mentioned. For whoever demands to see our originals, the original content is ascertained by one understanding the message decoding and restoring the translation. Accurate copies of faithfully coded transcriptions are publicly available. Since all 8000+ times Yâ-hwéh was omitted from the KJV were actually DUAL-name instances of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, what about the times where “Yâ-hwéh” was mentioned alone in the original? ALL of those times Yâ-hwéh was mentioned alone were ERASED by the coding method. You can find where it was in the Codes.doc in the FPS download as the Strong’s number code 2962 (kurios) or kurion.  All were omitted from coded Analytic LXX. Therefore “YHWH” (Yâ-hwéh) has been omitted FAR MORE times than 8,000! But why were ALL the single-name mentions of Yâ-hwéh omitted? Because there are TWO different Yâ-hwéhs, One is our Father the true Yâ-hwéh, and the other is not even one of us, being the false ya-hwéh, which is a demon that satan created and named it that single-name, which whichever nonsatanist discovers it usually stumbles completely, not knowing there are TWO, and throws out the name ENTIRELY because he learns just how BAD this demon is. You may even have met some of these, who busy themselves pointing out all the historical negative things which that ya-hwéh has done. So, how can one usually distinguish which is Which when decoding? By means of context, but most often because the TRUE Yâ-hwéh is described as ‘the Yâ-hwéh of Me’ (and it is Him dictating the scripture), whereas the FALSE Yâ-hwéh is described as ‘the Yâ-hwéh of the one (m.)’ but using a Hebraism that says that ‘when there is more than one, the other “one” is translatable as “other one” because it’s implied’. So, we often write in that instance, the standardized linguistically correct ‘the Yâ-hwéh of the other one (m.)’, wherein the other one (m.) is, as we have found, of ’avadówn (“Abaddon”). But there is even more we found, which needs to be shared in view of the fact that the satanists mislead others to mispronounce things. A long time ago perhaps around 2004 or so, I personally was in communication online with a very prominent Hebrew linguist, Anson F. Rainey, in the state of Israel, and discussed with him his knowledge about the linguistics of Yahweh, and even of Yahuwshua (although he did not have our beliefs because he had converted to Judaism from having been raised Christian). He described Yahweh as being a verb which he believed was a Hiphiyl conjugation. Then, he explained to me what vowels would be used in a Hiphiyl conjugation of the verb, which would use a patach short “a” which is NOT how we have published Yâ-hwéh always, before or after that, because we had and have come to the definite conclusion that the first vowel in Yâ-hwéh is a qamets â, which sounds like a short ŏ in English. We experimented with this name he described, which would be transliterated, using our method consistent with the Strong’s Lexicon, as “Ya-hwéh” instead of Yâ-hwéh, but we immediately noticed a silence with no inspiration, which stopped when we switched back. It was then that we researched which were the vowels that are used according to the particular verb conjugation type, which appears in our name study, His names proven, copied from the Gesenius Hebrew Grammar appendix. The vowels we were using for Yâ-hwéh, which acknowledged Him, were found to be exactly as per those found in the Hophal conjugation, giving us a new understanding of the meaning of His written name, and linguistic basis for the qamets â being in there. Notice that the MEANING of a Hiphiyl “Ya-hwéh” is also DIFFERENT than the HOPHAL conjugation we have been proclaiming. The false Hiphiyl “Ya-hwéh” means “He causes to become” and would have been transliterated IAUE for the Romans instead of IOUE, which did not happen. The true Hophal Yâ-hwéh means “He causes to be existed”, and goes consistent with the ancient Roman transliteration of IOUE (both Hiphiyl and Hophal are causative but Hophal is passive, -be existed)   So look at how this meaning fits the way it is found in decoded scripture: The “Yahweh” of the one .... becomes .... The one causing to become of the other one (the thing, the adversary, that is not even one of us at all) The Yahweh of Me .... becomes .... The one causing to be existed of Me (which also implies even the unpaired are of Him) So thus it is likely that when satan’s false Yahweh singular ha-shëm adopts that name, you may be hearing “Ya-hwéh” with a short patach “a” as Anson Rainey was saying. They will get no clue from their writing “Yahweh” that their pronunciation is mistaken, nor be made aware that there is a second, hidden name in His dual-names. Nonetheless, we will continue professing the Most High, saying and writing and pronouncing Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` with the qamets “â” which sounds like a short ŏ in its first of two dual-names, which is “ha-shimáyim”, a good response to whoever might tell you “hashem” in Hebrew. (you can look up these terms, Hiphil or similarly for Hophal, though sometimes they may be spelled a bit differently) The reason the satanist scribes were led by the adversary to erase all single-name mentions of Yâ-hwéh, is because anyone reading would see that there are TWO different Yahwehs, and the satanists wanted to conceal the false one, for people to think there is only ONE Yahweh, while at the SAME TIME erasing an ENORMOUS number of mentions of satan (2,031 coded as “S”, sâţâ´n 1,889 as <3> ’avadówn, and h hëylë´l 1,946 times), which results in what content satan said to be often falsely attributed to Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, and contributing to the Confusion, aka Bavel or Babylon, because the false yahweh is the BASIS of the confusion created by satan.

Some say, not knowing the spelling of this term, that it is a Hebrew word meaning “He saves”. It is not, though it does sound like it. The word that DOES mean “He saves” is found several places in the “Old Testament” scriptures, and examining the context, it is apparently referring to the antichrist, NOT to our Savior. But this “Yeshua” is spelled Y-Sh-uW. This three-letter word is actually an acronym for “Yemach Shemow Wzikhrow”, which in Hebrew means “May His name and memory be erased”. Why would it mean such a thing? Who would do such a thing? There was a rabbinic anti-Christian document, called the “Tales of Yeshu” (Toldoth Yeshu) dating back to 400 CE, which had plagiarized the Glad Tidings of MattithYâ´huw, and added lies and scorn, accusations and mockery. According to the “Tales of Yeshu” (Toldoth Yeshu), the original name of our Savior was Yâhuwshúa`, but when He “became a heretic/lunatic”, His name was changed to Yeshu, this acronym YSW So this acronym passing itself off as “He saves” is the term most often adopted by Jews to supposedly refer to Yâhuwshúa`, but with the hidden agenda to help erase His name and memory. As ‘Yeshua’ is not the name of our Savior in Truth, it is one of two means of calling the beast holding itself to two horns (a horn is a method of calling) in Revelation Chapter 13: 11. The other horn, used by the non-Jews, is ‘Jesus’.

Some people make reference to the Most High by writing these letters, without attempting to pronounce them or assign any vowels to it. The four letters attempt to transcribe those used in Ancient Hebrew, before the vowels were written into that language, to spell the first name of the dual-names of our Savior Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`. The name Yâ-hwéh was spelled with Hebrew letters would be correctly transcribed as YHWH. But this is correct according to the Ancient Hebrew original pronunciation of the letters. But the problems are several when people do not know the proper pronunciation of the ancient letters, and trust in the “modern Hebrew” version. The sixth Hebrew letter originally was a W, and it can appear as a W or an oW or a uW. But the Jewish speakers of Hebrew changed the pronunciation of several letters in their alphabet in their “modern Hebrew”, and the 6th Hebrew letter adopted a different sound, that of an English V, probably because the German W has that sound. Therefore, if you see someone write YHVH, then you understand why it is mistaken: they applied “modern Hebrew” Ashkenazi mistakes to their transliteration of ancient Hebrew letters.

See the Tetragrammaton and Barbelo.